Jan 08 2013
By Daoud Kuttab
One of the most important decisions following the UN vote on Palestine was made in the temporary Palestinian capital of Ramallah. Mahmoud Abbas issued a presidential decree on Jan. 6, 2013, calling for the issuance of new passports, driver’s licenses, stamps and other national identification documents all under the title of the State of Palestine. The 337-word decree based the decision on both the Palestinian Basic Law (temporary constitution) of 2003 and the UN resolution of Nov. 29, 2012.
The reaction mostly focused on the change in the title on passports from the Oslo-mandated “Palestinian Authority” to the term “State of Palestine.” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office issued a strong rejection of the decision, refusing any action that predetermines the outcome of talks and opposing the UN declaration of a Palestinian state.
Very few people were surprised by the Israeli decision, and therefore most people are skeptical that the Palestinians will in fact revise the single document needed to be released from the larger prison – the occupation. Any changes to the Palestinian passport or ID card (both based on the Oslo Accords’ terminology of Palestinian Authority) will simply deny their holders a chance to travel across the borders which Israel still firmly controls. The new passports could be easily acceptable around the world, but it is unlikely to be of any use on the Israeli side of the King Hussein (or Allenby Bridge).
What Netanayhu and the rest of the media didn’t notice was a single line in the decree that talks about the issuance of a national ID number for Palestinians everywhere. Until the UN declaration, the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority had restricted the issuance of passports to those Palestinians living inside the occupied West Bank (minus East Jerusalem) and Gaza Strip. Palestinians in the diaspora were not included as part of this privilege.
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s decree, if enacted, would potentially provide passports and other identification documents to 11.6 million Palestinians. According to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, 5.1 million Palestinians live in Arab countries, 655,000 in other countries and 1.4 million live in Israel.
Cognizant of the fact that many of the diaspora Palestinians have unique relationships in the countries that they live in, the presidential decree stated in the first clause that the issuance of these documents should not endanger the status or the rights of Palestinians with their host countries.
While Palestinians, especially in Lebanon, will be happy to have a chance to hold a national passport instead of the restrictive travel documents issued by host countries, it is not clear whether other Palestinians will ask for or be permitted by host countries to use these documents for travel and other official purposes.
Having a single national number for all Palestinians should do a lot to help provide a central reference point as to where Palestinians live and whatever problems they might face.
The decision of Abbas to use the name of the State of Palestine on all documents, including mail, will still need to be tested on various levels. Israel has said that they will reject any mail addressed to the State of Palestine.
It is not clear also whether the new policy will change the working relations of Palestinians with the Land Authority or whether new deeds will be issued under the new name. Again, there is also the uncertainty over whether Israeli courts would recognize such documents.
Whatever happens, however, this courageous step allows Abbas and the Palestine Liberation Organization to be free of some of the shackles that the Israelis and others have placed on them by restricting their movement based on an Israeli-prescribed formula. The decision no doubt removes some of the vagueness that has existed between the Palestinian Authority and Palestinian embassies abroad. Now the State of Palestine is a unifying address for all Palestinians everywhere.
Naturally, the one community that will not be able to benefit directly from the new documents will be Palestinians in the West Bank (outside of Jerusalem), who are still under direct Israeli occupation and whose movement is still based on the benevolence of the occupiers.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.