The reality on the ground in Palestine is hard to refute. The presence of any international civilian in the occupied areas is an instant guarantee of a considerably lower level of violence, brutality and death. Simply put, we Palestinians need to ensure that as many international civilians as possible are in our midst for our protection and for safeguarding the peace process. Add more outsiders, and the vicious cycle of violence could be broken or greatly reduced.

Just look at the West Bank: The farther one travels from East Jerusalem, going either north or south, the fewer international civilians there are — and the higher the numbers of injured and dead are. It is no coincidence that Jenin, which lies in the northern tip of the West Bank, far removed from Jerusalem, was the scene of the most brutal attacks and the most flagrant human rights violations of the recent Israeli assault.

But consider Hebron. Ever since the mass murder committed by a Jewish settler against 29 worshiping Muslims in 1994, there has been a strong international presence there, which is the main reason for the relatively calm situation recently. The outsiders in Hebron include a group of mostly Scandinavian, unarmed observers, as well as a group of American Christian peace activists known as the Christian Peace Team. The activists walk the areas of Palestinian-Israeli friction armed with nothing more than their personal courage and possibly a camera or a video recorder. The effect of outside observers in Kosovo in reducing violence is also undisputable.

I would propose something similar for the West Bank and Gaza as a whole: a major role for an outside force, perhaps made up of civilians as well as regular peacekeepers, that would help provide the peoples and the parties of the region with a badly needed calm and sense of security. Such a calm can’t take place when a powerful occupying army acts with such reckless disregard for human life and dignity.

The international force must have a mandate to enforce the peace. It could even be lightly armed. It could be a U.N. force or a U.S.-led multinational force. The world powers that have invested so much money in war and destruction could make a small contribution to peace in our region by funding this force. This force could also help stop the mutual finger-pointing and provide a neutral witness to those who are guilty of violating any agreed-upon commitments. It would surely have impressive results, as in Hebron, on a much larger scale across the Palestinian territories.

The reality on the ground in Palestine is hard to refute. The presence of any international civilian in the occupied areas is an instant guarantee of a considerably lower level of violence, brutality and death. Simply put, we Palestinians need to ensure that as many international civilians as possible are in our midst for our protection and for safeguarding the peace process. Add more outsiders, and the vicious cycle of violence could be broken or greatly reduced.

Just look at the West Bank: The farther one travels from East Jerusalem, going either north or south, the fewer international civilians there are — and the higher the numbers of injured and dead are. It is no coincidence that Jenin, which lies in the northern tip of the West Bank, far removed from Jerusalem, was the scene of the most brutal attacks and the most flagrant human rights violations of the recent Israeli assault.

But consider Hebron. Ever since the mass murder committed by a Jewish settler against 29 worshiping Muslims in 1994, there has been a strong international presence there, which is the main reason for the relatively calm situation recently. The outsiders in Hebron include a group of mostly Scandinavian, unarmed observers, as well as a group of American Christian peace activists known as the Christian Peace Team. The activists walk the areas of Palestinian-Israeli friction armed with nothing more than their personal courage and possibly a camera or a video recorder. The effect of outside observers in Kosovo in reducing violence is also undisputable.

I would propose something similar for the West Bank and Gaza as a whole: a major role for an outside force, perhaps made up of civilians as well as regular peacekeepers, that would help provide the peoples and the parties of the region with a badly needed calm and sense of security. Such a calm can’t take place when a powerful occupying army acts with such reckless disregard for human life and dignity.

The international force must have a mandate to enforce the peace. It could even be lightly armed. It could be a U.N. force or a U.S.-led multinational force. The world powers that have invested so much money in war and destruction could make a small contribution to peace in our region by funding this force. This force could also help stop the mutual finger-pointing and provide a neutral witness to those who are guilty of violating any agreed-upon commitments. It would surely have impressive results, as in Hebron, on a much larger scale across the Palestinian territories.

The Palestinian president Yasser Arafat besieged by the Israelis in Ramallah since last December and imprisoned in his office since March 29 has repeatedly condemned suicide bombings that have killed innocent Israelis. It is time for the US president to condemn the latest Israeli indiscriminate violence against innocent Palestinians.

Violent attacks against innocent civilians are reprehensible. No one should be immune from criticism not even the United State’s strategic ally, Israel.

In an important talk about the Middle East situation last week, US President George Bush has singled out Yasser Arafat for criticism. In remarks made during a joint press conference with Prime Minister Tony Blair April 6 President Bush appears to have bought into the Israeli propaganda. Speaking at Crawford High School in Texas, the president called on Arafat to condemn terror. "He needs to speak clearly, in Arabic, to the people of that region and condemn terrorist activities. At the very minimum, he ought to at least say something.

Sorry Mr. President but Arafat has spoken out repeatedly and consistently in Arabic against terror and suicide attacks. On March 28th at 1400GMT the Voice of Palestine ran the following story quoting in Arabic quoting PA official Ahmed Abdel Rahman denouncing the Netanya suicide attack:

"The Palestinian leadership strongly denounces the Netanya operation against Israeli civilians, particularly because it was carried out today, during the Passover and when General Zinni is continuing his mission to bring about a cease-fire. "

The following day Arafat spoke on Palestine TV at 2008 GMT stating in Arabic

"I would like once again to reiterate our condemnation of yesterday’s operation in Netanya, in which a number of innocent Israeli civilians were killed and wounded. This operation constitutes a deviation from our policy and a violation of our national and human values. I affirm our commitment to working toward an immediate cease-fire, as we informed General Zinni. We highly value his efforts. We informed him that we are ready for the immediate implementation of the Tenet’s work plan without conditions, and without prejudicing any of its articles."

These statements, which were broadcast on Palestinian media, were later rebroadcast on tens of Arabic language radio and television channels.

This is not the first time that the US administration has adopted undocumented Israelis claims. Six years earlier when Benjamin Netanyahu was prime minister a similar claim was made that what Arafat says in English he doesn’t say in Arabic. At that time a bipartisan committee of the US congress was formed to investigate that claim. Three months and after reviewing thousands of documents, the congressional committee came back negative. There was no difference, they stated.

Ironically, while the US has avoided to recognize the statements by Arafat denouncing terrorism, they have themselves refused to make a single statement denouncing what the Israeli army has done to the Palestinian population. Tens of civilians have been killed hundreds injured; hundreds of thousands have been imprisoned in their homes without basic subsistence for days. Ambulances have been run over by Israeli tanks, Red Cross officials denied freedom of movement, journalists have been shot at, one Italian journalist killed, and pregnant women and or their babies have died at checkpoints. Even an American Palestinian bled to death in Ramallah without the Israelis allowing her and her children needed emergency care. Islamic holy places have been defiled, Christian leaders have been denied permission to visit their parishes in the birthplace of Christ and three million Palestinians remain in a big jail with the Israelis holding the keys. In all these stark violations of Palestinian human rights, the United States government has not said any word in English, Hebrew or any other language.

President Bush says he is unhappy with the leadership of Yasser Arafat. The Palestinian leader who was duly elected in free and fair elections supervised among others by former US President Carter has responded to this interference in Palestinian political life. Speaking on Palestine Television at 1600 GMT on December 16th from his Ramallah office Arafat again, in Arabic, condemned terror and offered a democratic solution to the issue of his leadership.

"Today, I emphasize once again the complete and immediate halt to all armed operations. Once again, I call for a complete halt to all operations, especially suicidal operations, which we have always condemned.

"I would like to seize this opportunity to assert our democratic option. We are ready to hold democratic elections in all sectors, whether municipal or legislative, when secure circumstances are available."

I still remember the day early in March 1997 when I was handed a piece of paper issued by the Palestinian Authority allowing us at Al Quds University’s Institute of Modern Media to establish a local television station in Ramallah. With lots of energy and almost no resources we began the process of setting up Al Quds Educational Television. We wanted an independent TV station that was neither a governmental mouthpiece nor a commercial station that lives by game shows and shampoo

It wasn’t easy but we were largely successful until this week.

Five years after launching our first broadcast using a 40-Watt transmitter and screening a gold fish in glass bowl swimming to the sounds of Beethoven, our dreams have been shattered. Our station, which has grown in size, viewers and program, has been arbitrarily closed, our equipment has been destroyed and Israeli soldiers are using our offices, studios and equipment as their bowling ally. No order was issued for this closure, we didn’t violate any law. The destruction was simply an act of unprovoked and uncivilized aggression

From early on the going was tough, but our existence until this week was never in doubt. We tried to stay independent, as the best means we believed will help us in the pursuit of serving our people. We received little help in our mission. The major international donors wanted to help the state-run television as a means to boost the Palestinian Authority. With help from Palestinian foundations like the Welfare Association and international organizations like the Open Society Foundation and the Ford Foundation we were able to create a Palestinian TV station that combined PBS and C-Span-type of public service programming.

Early on, senior leaders in the Palestinian Authority were not happy with us. When we started broadcasting live sessions of the elected Palestinian Legislative Council, Palestine TV started jamming us. When we aired a session that dealt with corruption in the Palestinian Authority I was arrested and held in a Palestinian jail for seven days. My release as a result of local and international pressure helped secure our station’s continuity and progress.

Since then and despite some programming critical of the Palestinian Authority, we were left alone. On our screens we have dealt with issues ranging from children’s rights to the problems of early marriage among young Palestinian women. From issues about physical and sexual abuse of children to programs dealing with our societies lack of respect for individuals with disabilities. We tackled issues dealing with the environment, public health and family planning. Freedom of expression and presenting multiple opinions on social economic and political issues were our motto.

During this time, and despite many pressures, we were excited about our efforts. We felt that we were not only building up a TV station but contributing in the building of our society. Throughout this period we felt firmly that we were laying the blocks for a cohesive progressive society that will be the foundation of an independent state.

As part of the vision of the president of Al Quds University, Professor Sari Nuseibeh, we embarked on a brave television co production to produce a Palestinian-Israeli version of Sesame Street. The program was produced with the aim of teaching both our children mutual respect and tolerance. We even used the same image of the fish from our first broadcast to teach children the Arabic word for fish samak. Although the program was aired on our and other local Palestinian television stations, the harsh realities on the ground made our job much more difficult. The Netanyahu Administration had dashed all previous hoped for peace and it was clear that the situation had not changed enough to allow our children to consider paying serious attention to the television program’s curriculum goals of tolerance and mutual respect.

It wasn’t only the children who were disappointed with the lack of progress in the effort to end the Israeli occupation. We were all unhappy with the continued Israeli hesitation in delivering on our right to freedom from checkpoints and travel permits not to mention the continued illegal settlement activities.

Yet we kept hoping. For so long we kept on hoping, refusing to give-in to despair. As late as last week and despite the Israeli humiliations to our president and our people we kept the vision alive.

When the latest Israeli incursion occurred we tried our best to keep our cool despite the next to impossible mission of running an educational television station in such times. Tanks were rolling around our city, our staff was under curfew and we were cut off from each other except for telephone contacts. The fact that our station was on the edge of town sparred us in the early days of the incursion. We kept running our station with a mix of public service messages (phone numbers of medical care etc.) plus public service programming. A series of 13 Public Service Messages that we produced with UNICEF with the aim of helping parents and children deal with the trauma of violence were repeatedly broadcast.

But this Israeli honeymoon didn’t last. At 6:30 on April 2, 2002, Israeli soldiers came to the four story Medical Professions College Building where located and began destroying our dream. Every office in this educational facility was broken into, equipment was destroyed and office space was settled into by the invading soldiers. Our two remaining staff members manning the broadcast were arrested and held for four hours in the cold before being released. Moments before their arrest they turned off the transmitter in fear that the Israeli soldiers would repeat what they did at a local commercial station a few days earlier. When the Israelis occupied the building housing Watan TV, they kicked away its staff and after a while the soldiers started to broadcast pornographic material.

While being held, the two remaining staff in the building and the University’s guard heard and noticed the destruction of our building. They saw television cameras and invaluable video archives thrown from the fourth floor where our equipment and studio are located. Neighbors saw at least five Israel tanks rolling in and parking in the parking lot where professors and television staff used to park. The entire building’s offices were lit till late hours of the night and when a number of our viewers called to find out what was happening Israeli soldiers answered our phones as if this was their private homes.

I am fortunate that my family and our staff have not been physically hurt. When compared to the fate of others we must be grateful.

But what happened hurt when seen in the context of what one has been working for all his life. The attempt to destroy our dream, both personally in building a useful educational TV station, or collectively in building a viable state, will not be shattered by such reprehensive actions.

It will not be easy to pick up the pieces after one experiences such brutality and lack of respect by individuals who no doubt bring shame to the nation and religion that they belong to.

I have no doubt that we will rebuild our television station and re ignites the hope that we had five years ago. At the same time I am confident that our people with the support of the international community will rise from the pain and build the foundation of a viable state that can live in peace with its neighbors.